The Predictive Value of Graft Viability and Bioenergetics Testing Towards the Outcome in Liver Transplantation.

Donor organ biomarkers with sufficient predictive value in liver transplantation (LT) are lacking. We herein evaluate liver viability and mitochondrial bioenergetics for their predictive capacity towards the outcome in LT. We enrolled 43 consecutive patients undergoing LT. Liver biopsy samples taken upon arrival after static cold storage were assessed by histology, real-time confocal imaging analysis (RTCA), and high-resolution respirometry (HRR) for mitochondrial respiration of tissue homogenates. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) served as primary endpoint. HRR data were analysed with a focus on the efficacy of ATP production or P-L control efficiency, calculated as 1-L/P from the capacity of oxidative phosphorylation P and non-phosphorylating respiration L. Twenty-two recipients experienced EAD. Pre-transplant histology was not predictive of EAD. The mean RTCA score was significantly lower in the EAD cohort (-0.75 ± 2.27) compared to the IF cohort (0.70 ± 2.08; p = 0.01), indicating decreased cell viability. P-L control efficiency was predictive of EAD (0.76 ± 0.06 in IF vs. 0.70 ± 0.08 in EAD-livers; p = 0.02) and correlated with the RTCA score. Both RTCA and P-L control efficiency in biopsy samples taken during cold storage have predictive capacity towards the outcome in LT. Therefore, RTCA and HRR should be considered for risk stratification, viability assessment, and bioenergetic testing in liver transplantation.

Donor and recipient risk factors for the development of primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation.

Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of both short-term and long-term morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Various donor, recipient, and technical risk factors have been previously identified as being associated with the development of PGD. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the current literature as it pertains to PGD following lung transplantation, as well as discussing current strategies to mitigate PGD and future directions. We will pay special attention to recent advances in lung transplantation such as ex-vivo lung perfusion, thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, and up-to-date literature published in the interim since the 2016 ISHLT consensus statement on PGD and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Long-Term Survival Following Primary Graft Dysfunction Development in Lung Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a known risk factor for early mortality following lung transplant (LT). However, the outcomes of patients who achieve long-term survival following index hospitalization are unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term association of PGD grade 3 (PGD3) in patients without in-hospital mortality. METHODS: LT recipients were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database. Patients were stratified based on the grade of PGD at 72 h (No PGD, Grade 1/2 or Grade 3). Groups were assessed with comparative statistics. Long-term survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariable shared frailty model including recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics. RESULTS: The PGD3 group had significantly increased length of stay, dialysis, and treated rejection post-transplant (P < 0.001). Unadjusted survival analysis revealed a significant difference in long-term survival (P < 0.001) between groups; however, following adjustment, PGD3 was not independently associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio: 0.972; 95% confidence interval: 0.862-1.096). Increased mortality was significantly associated with increased recipient age and treated rejection. Decreased mortality was significantly associated with no donor diabetes, bilateral LT as compared to single LT, transplant in 2015-2016 and 2017-2018, and no post-transplant dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: While PGD3 remains a challenge post LT, PGD3 at 72 h is not independently associated with decreased long-term survival, while complications such as dialysis and rejection are, in patients who survive index hospitalization. Transplant providers should be aggressive in preventing further complications in recipients with severe PGD to minimize the negative association on long-term survival.

Computed Tomography Volumetrics for Size Matching in Lung Transplantation for Restrictive Disease.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal allograft sizing strategy for lung transplantation in restrictive lung disease. Current methods that are based on predicted total lung capacity (pTLC) ratios do not account for the diminutive recipient chest size. The study investigators hypothesized that a new sizing ratio incorporating preoperative recipient computed tomographic lung volumes (CTVol) would be associated with postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution study was conducted of adults undergoing primary bilateral lung transplantation between January 2016 and July 2020 for restrictive lung disease. CTVol was computed for recipients by using advanced segmentation software. Two sizing ratios were calculated: pTLC ratio (pTLCdonor/pTLCrecipient) and a new volumetric ratio (pTLCdonor/CTVolrecipient). Patients were divided into reference, oversized, and undersized groups on the basis of ratio quintiles, and multivariable models were used to assess the effect of the ratios on primary graft dysfunction and survival. RESULTS: CTVol was successfully acquired in 218 of 220 (99.1%) patients. In adjusted analysis, undersizing on the basis of the volumetric ratio was independently associated with decreased primary graft dysfunction grade 2 or 3 within 72 hours (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.87; P =.02). The pTLC ratio was not significantly associated with primary graft dysfunction. Oversizing on the basis of the volumetric ratio was independently associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.04-4.99; P =.04], whereas the pTLC ratio did not have a significant survival association. CONCLUSIONS: Using computed tomography-acquired lung volumes for donor-recipient size matching in lung transplantation is feasible with advanced segmentation software. This method may be more predictive of outcome compared with current sizing methods, which use gender and height only.

Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Primary Graft Dysfunction After Cardiac Transplantation: Results of an A Priori Ventless Approach.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after cardiac transplantation is a devastating complication with increasing frequency lately in the setting of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Severe PGD is commonly treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using central or peripheral cannulation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of PGD after cardiac transplantation requiring ECMO support at our center from 2015 to 2020, focused on our now preferential approach using peripheral cannulation without a priori venting. During the study period, 255 patients underwent heart transplantation at our center and 26 (10.2%) of them required ECMO for PGD. Of 24 patients cannulated peripherally 19 (79%) were alive at 30 days and 17 (71%) 1 year after transplant; two additional patients underwent central ECMO cannulation due to unfavorable size of femoral vessels and concern for limb ischemia. Successful decannulation with full graft function recovery occurred in 22 of 24 (92%) patients cannulated peripherally. Six of them had an indwelling intra-aortic balloon pump placed before the transplantation. None of the other 18 patients received a ventricular vent. In conclusion, the use of an a priori peripheral and ventless ECMO approach in patients with PGD after heart transplant is an effective strategy associated with high rates of graft recovery and survival.

Effect of antifibrotic agents on postoperative complications after lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrotic agents (AFAs) are now standard-of-care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Concerns have arisen about the safety of these drugs in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: We performed a multi-centre, nationwide, retrospective, observational study of French IPF patients undergoing LTx between 2011 and 2018 to determine whether maintaining AFAs in the peri-operative period leads to increased bronchial anastomoses issues, delay in skin healing and haemorrhagic complications. We compared the incidence of post-operative complications and the survival of patients according to AFA exposure. RESULTS: Among 205 patients who underwent LTx for IPF during the study period, 58 (28%) had received AFAs within 4 weeks before LTx (AFA group): pirfenidone in 37 (18.0%) and nintedanib in 21 (10.2%). The median duration of AFA treatment before LTx was 13.8 (5.6-24) months. The AFA and control groups did not significantly differ in airway, bleeding or skin healing complications (p = 0.91, p = 0.12 and p = 0.70, respectively). Primary graft dysfunction was less frequent in the AFA than control group (26% vs. 43%, p = 0.02), and the 90-day mortality was lower (7% vs. 18%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: AFA therapy did not increase airway, bleeding or wound post-operative complications after LTx and could be associated with reduced rates of primary graft dysfunction and 90-day mortality.

HLA sensitization is associated with an increased risk of primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation (HT). We sought to determine the association between pretransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization, as measured using the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) value, and the risk of PGD. METHODS: Consecutive adult HT recipients (n = 596) from 1/2015 to 12/2019 at 2 US centers were included. Severity of PGD was based on the 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement. For each recipient, unacceptable HLA antigens were obtained and locus-specific cPRA (cPRA-LS) and pre-HT donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were assessed. RESULTS: Univariable logistic modeling showed that peak cPRA-LS for all loci and HLA-A was associated with increased severity of PGD as an ordinal variable (all loci: OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p = 0.025, HLA-A: OR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.26, p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed peak cPRA-LS for HLA-A, recipient beta-blocker use, total ischemic time, donor age, prior cardiac surgery, and United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 or 2 were associated with increased severity of PGD. The presence of DSA to HLA-B was associated with trend toward increased risk of mild-to-moderate PGD (OR 2.56, 95% CI: 0.99-6.63, p = 0.053), but DSA to other HLA loci was not associated with PGD. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization for all HLA loci, and specifically HLA-A, is associated with an increased severity of PGD. These factors should be included in pre-HT risk stratification to minimize the risk of PGD.

Developing machine learning models to predict primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the first 30 days after lung transplantation. Risk factors for the development of PGD include donor and recipient characteristics, but how multiple variables interact to impact the development of PGD and how clinicians should consider these in making decisions about donor acceptance remain unclear. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study to develop and evaluate machine learning pipelines to predict the development of PGD grade 3 within the first 72 hours of transplantation using donor and recipient variables that are known at the time of donor offer acceptance. Among 576 bilateral lung recipients, 173 (30%) developed PGD grade 3. The cohort underwent a 75% to 25% train-test split, and lasso regression was used to identify 11 variables for model development. A K-nearest neighbor's model showing the best calibration and performance with relatively small confidence intervals was selected as the final predictive model with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.65. Machine learning models can predict the risk for development of PGD grade 3 based on data available at the time of donor offer acceptance. This may improve donor-recipient matching and donor utilization in the future.

Association of cardiac preservation solution with short-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

AIMS: There is wide variability in the practice of cardiac preservation for heart transplantation. Prior reports suggest that the type of solution may be linked with a reduced incidence of posttransplantation complications. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years old) heart recipients who underwent transplantation between 2015 and 2021 in the United States were examined. Recipients were stratified by solution utilized for their grafts at the time of recovery: University of Wisconsin, histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), or Celsior solution. The primary endpoint was a composite of 30-day mortality, primary graft dysfunction, or re-transplantation. Risk adjustment was performed for the recipient, donor, and procedural characteristics using regression modeling. RESULTS: Among 16 884 recipients, the group distribution was University of Wisconsin solution 53%, HTK 22%, Celsior solution 15%, and other 10%. The observed incidence of the composite endpoint (University of Wisconsin solution = 3.6%, HTK = 4.0%, Celsior solution = 3.7%, P = 0.301) and 1-year survival (University of Wisconsin solution = 91.7%, HTK = 91.3%, Celsior solution = 91.7%, log-rank P = 0.777) were similar between groups. After adjustment, HTK was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint [odds ratio (OR) 1.249, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.019-1.525, P = 0.030] in reference to University of Wisconsin solution. This association was substantially increased among recipients with ischemic periods of greater than 4 h (OR 1.817, 95% CI 1.188-2.730, P = 0.005). The risks were similar between University of Wisconsin solution and Celsior solution (P = 0.454). CONCLUSION: The use of the histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution during cold static storage for cardiac preservation is associated with increased rates of early mortality or primary graft dysfunction. Clinician discretion should guide its use, especially when prolonged ischemic times (>4 h) are anticipated.

The role of lung microbiota in primary graft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the lung microbiota is altered in critically ill patients and predicts clinical outcomes. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a common complication and a leading cause of death within 1 month of lung transplantation, but the clinical significance of changes in the lung bacterial community during PGD is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the contribution of the lung microbiota to the development and course of severe PGD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to characterize the lung microbiota of 32 lung transplant patients with combined PGD using next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage samples. The relationship between lung flora dysbiosis and lung immunity in PGD was assessed by quantification of alveolar cytokines. The contribution of microbiota characteristics to patient outcomes was assessed by estimating overall survival. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with PGD grade 3 showed a reduction in alpha diversity, driven by a significant increase in the abundance of the genera Modestobacter, Scardovia and Selenomonas, and a reduction in the proportion of the genera Klebsiella and Oribacterium. Alpha diversity of the lung microbiota in PGD3 patients was negatively correlated with BALF interleukin (IL)-2 (r = -.752, p < .05). In addition, bacterial diversity in the lung microbiota of non-survivors was lower than that of survivors (p = .041). CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in the lung microbiota of PGD grade 3 patients and dysbiosis of the lung microbiota is associated with lung immunity. The lung microbiota has potential in the diagnosis and treatment of PGD grade 3.

Hemodynamic failure and graft dysfunction after lung transplant: A possible clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences.

INTRODUCTION: The postoperative hemodynamic management after lung transplant (LUTX) is guided by limited evidence. We aimed to describe and evaluate risk factors and outcomes of postoperative vasoactive support of LUTX recipients. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive adult LUTX, two cohorts were identified: (1) patients needing prolonged vasoactive support (>12 h from ICU admission) (VASO+); (2) or not (VASO-). Postoperative hemodynamic characteristics were thoroughly analyzed. Risk factors and outcomes of VASO+ versus VASO- cohorts were assessed by multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients were included (86 (62%) VASO+ versus 52 (38%) VASO-). Vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) were used in the first postoperative days (vasoactive inotropic score at 12 h: 6 [4-12]), while inodilators (dobutamine, levosimendan) later. Length of vasoactive support was 3 [2-4] days. Independent predictors of vasoactive use were: LUTX indication different from cystic fibrosis (p = .003), higher Oto score (p = .020), longer cold ischemia time (p = .031), but not preoperative cardiac catheterization. VASO+ patients showed concomitant hemodynamic and graft impairment, with longer mechanical ventilation (p = .010), higher primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade at 72 h (PGD grade > 0 65% vs. 31%, p = .004, OR 4.2 [1.54-11.2]), longer ICU (p < .001) and hospital stay (p = .013). Levosimendan as a second-line inodilator appeared safe. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoactive support is frequently necessary after LUTX, especially in recipients of grafts of lesser quality. Postoperative hemodynamic dysfunction requiring vasopressor support and graft dysfunction may represent a clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences. Further studies may elucidate if this represents a possible treatable condition.

The Role of Recipient Thyroid Hormone Supplementation in Primary Graft Dysfunction After Heart Transplantation: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether recipient administration of thyroid hormone (liothyronine [T3]) is associated with reduced rates of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after orthotopic heart transplantation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 609 adult heart transplant recipients were divided into 2 cohorts: patients who did not receive T3 (no T3 group, from 2009 to 2014), and patients who received T3 (T3 group, from 2015 to 2019). Propensity-adjusted logistic regression was performed to assess the association between T3 supplementation and PGD. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria and propensity-score analysis, the final cohort included 461 patients. The incidence of PGD was not significantly different between the groups (33.9% no T3 group v 40.8% T3 group; p = 0.32). Mortality at 30 days (3% no T3 group v 2% T3 group; p = 0.53) and 1 year (10% no T3 group v 12% T3 group; p = 0.26) were also not significantly different. When assessing the severity of PGD, there were no differences in the groups' rates of moderate PGD (not requiring mechanical circulatory support other than an intra-aortic balloon pump) or severe PGD (requiring mechanical circulatory support other than an intra-aortic balloon pump). However, segmented time regression analysis revealed that patients in the T3 group were less likely to develop severe PGD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicated that recipient single-dose thyroid hormone administration may not protect against the development of PGD, but may attenuate the severity of PGD.

LncRNA H19 aggravates primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation via KLF5-mediated activation of CCL28.

The present study aims to elucidate the possible involvement of H19 in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following lung transplantation (LT) and the underlying mechanism. The transcriptome data were obtained through high-throughput sequencing analysis, and the differential long noncoding RNAs and messenger RNAs were screened for coexpression analysis. The interaction among H19, KLF5 and CCL28 was analyzed. A hypoxia-induced human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell injury model was established, in which H19 was knocked down to elucidate its effect on the lung function, inflammatory response, and cell apoptosis. An orthotopic left LT model was constructed for in vivo mechanistic validation. High-throughput transcriptome sequencing analysis revealed the involvement of the H19/KLF5/CCL28 signaling axis in PGD. Silencing of H19 reduced inflammatory response and thus improved PGD. CCL28 secreted by human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells after LT recruited neutrophils and macrophages. Mechanistic investigations indicated that H19 augmented the expression of CCL28 by binding to the transcription factor KLF5. Abundant expression of CCL28 reversed the alleviating effect of H19 silencing on PGD. In conclusion, the results point out that H19 exerts a promoting effect on PGD through increasing KLF5 expression and the subsequent CCL28 expression. Our study provides a novel insight into the mechanism of action of H19.

Impact of statin treatment and exposure on the risk of chronic allograft dysfunction in Chinese lung transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was a common complication following lung transplantation that contributed to long-term morbidity and mortality. Statin therapy had been suggested to attenuate recipient inflammation and immune response, potentially reducing the risk and severity of CLAD. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of statin use and in vivo exposure on the incidence of CLAD in lung transplant recipients (LTRs), as well as their effects on immune cells and inflammatory factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent lung transplantation between January 2017 and December 2020. The incidence of CLAD, as per the 2019 ISHLT criteria, was assessed as the clinical outcome. The plasma concentrations of statin were measured using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method, while inflammation marker levels were determined using ELISA kits. RESULTS: The statin group exhibited a significantly lower rate of CLAD (P = 0.002). Patients receiving statin therapy showed lower CD4+ T-cell counts, total T-lymphocyte counts, and IL-6 levels (P = 0.017, P = 0.048, and P = 0.038, respectively). Among the CLAD groups, the atorvastatin level (2.51 ± 1.31 ng/ml) was significantly lower than that in the non-CLAD group (OR = 1.438, 95%CI (1.007-2.053), P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Statin therapy significantly reduced the incidence of CLAD, as well as immune cell counts and inflammatory cytokine levels in LTRs. Although the statin exposure was significantly lower in CLAD patients, it was not associated with the incidence of CLAD.

Lactate concentration at the end of liver transplant: Early predictor of graft function or just one piece of the puzzle?

BACKGROUND: The post-operative course after Liver Transplantation (LT) can be complicated by early allograft dysfunction (EAD), primary nonfunction (PNF) and death. A lactate concentration at the end of transplant of ≥5 mmol/L was recently proposed as a predictive marker of PNF, EAD, and mortality; this study aimed to validate these previous reports in a large single center cohort. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult liver transplant recipients who received grafts from deceased donors at our center between June 2012 and May 2021. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the lactate concentration at the end of transplantation were computed to determine the AUC for PNF, EAD and mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: In our cohort of 1137 cases, the AUCs for lactate to predict EAD, PNF and mortality were respectively .56 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .53-.60), .69 (95% CI: .52-.85), and .74 (95% CI: .63-.84). CONCLUSION: The clinical value of lactate concentration at the end of transplantation to predict PNF, EAD and mortality at 90 days was, at best, modest, as shown by the relatively low AUCs. Our findings cannot validate previous reports that the lactate level alone is a good predictor of poor outcomes after liver transplantation.

Three year post heart transplant outcomes of desensitized durable mechanical circulatory support patients.

BACKGROUND: The risks and benefits of desensitization therapy (DST) in highly sensitized mechanical circulatory support (MCS) patients are not well known. We investigated 3 year post-transplant outcomes of desensitized durable MCS patients. METHODS: Among 689 consecutively enrolled heart transplantation recipients between 2010 and 2016, we categorized them into Group A (desensitized MCS patients, n = 21), Group B (desensitized non-MCS patients, n = 28) and Group C (all nondesensitized patients, n = 640). Post-transplant outcomes included the incidence of primary graft dysfunction, 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and infectious complications. RESULTS: The types of DST in Groups A and B were similar and included combinations of rituximab/intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis/bortezomib. Group A, compared with Group B, showed significantly higher pre-DST panel reactive antibody (PRA) (92.2 ± 9.8 vs. 83.3 ± 15.6, P = 0.007) and higher PRA reduction after DST (-22.2 ± 26.9 vs. -6.3 ± 7.5, P = 0.015). Groups A and C showed comparable primary graft dysfunction, 3-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, any treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, and AMR. Although statistically not significant, Group A showed numerically higher 3-year freedom from AMR than Group B. Infectious complications were similar in both Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: DST for MCS patients showed significant PRA reduction, resulting in an expansion of the donor pool. The post-transplant outcome of desensitized MCS patients showed comparable clinical outcomes to non-desensitized control patients in the same study period, revealing the safety and efficacy of DST.

Impact of total ischaemic time and disease severity class on graft function after bilateral lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Total ischaemic time (IT) is considered a limiting factor in lung transplantation. In this retrospective study, we investigate effects of IT and disease burden on outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 1298 patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation between January 2010 and May 2022 (follow-up 100%, median 54 months) were included. Pre-transplant diseases' severity (recipient body mass index, recipient age, previous lung transplantation, Tacrolimus immunosuppression, preoperative recipient extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, lung volume reduction) for graft failure was individually calculated and-as IT-categorized. Vice versa adjusted Cox models were calculated. Considering competing risks, we assessed cumulative incidences of airway obstructive complications and chronic lung allograft dysfunction with death as competing risk factors for primary graft dysfunction were assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Higher disease burden significantly accelerated chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death occurrence (P < 0.001); IT did not. IT-adjusted disease burden strata showed 50% graft survival differences at 11 years after transplantation (range 24-74%), disease burden-adjusted IT strata 18% for all and 6% (54-60%) among those above 7 h. All significant primary graft dysfunction risk factors were diagnoses related, IT was not significantly important and odds ratios did not increase with IT. CONCLUSIONS: The eventual graft survival disadvantage that results from an IT between 7 and at least 11 h is negligible in contrast to frequent recipients' disease-based risk levels.

Development and validation of a nomogram model to predict primary graft dysfunction in patients after lung transplantation based on the clinical factors.

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD), a significant complication that can affect patients' prognosis and quality of life, develops within 72 h post lung transplantation (LTx). Early detection and prevention of PGD should be given special consideration. The purpose of this study was to create a clinical prediction model to forecast the occurrence of PGD. METHODS: We collected information on 622 LTx patients from Wuxi People's Hospital from 2016 to 2020 and used the data to construct the prediction model. Information on 224 patients from 2021 to June 2022 was used for external validation. We used LASSO regression for variable screening. A nomogram was developed for model presentation. Distinctness, fit, and calibration were used to evaluate the performance of the model. RESULTS: Subjects with respiratory failure, who received fresh frozen plasma, donor age, donor gender, donor mechanism of death, donor smoking, donor ventilator use time, and donor PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio were independent predictor variables for the occurrence of PGD. The area under the curve of the nomogram was .779. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good model fit (P = .158). The calibration curve of the nomogram is fairly close to the ideal diagonal. Moreover, the decision curve analysis revealed a positive net benefit of the model. External validation also confirmed the reliability of the model. CONCLUSIONS: The nomogram of PGD based on clinical risk factors in postoperative LTx patients was established with high reliability. It provides clinicians and nurses with a new and effective tool for early prediction of PGD and early intervention.

Primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a clinical syndrome occurring within the first 72 h after lung transplantation and is characterized clinically by progressive hypoxemia and radiographically by patchy alveolar infiltrates. Resulting from ischemia-reperfusion injury, PGD represents a complex interplay between donor and recipient immunologic factors, as well as acute inflammation leading to alveolar cell damage. In the long term, chronic inflammation invoked by PGD can contribute to the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, an important cause of late mortality after lung transplant. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent work has aimed to identify risk factors for PGD, focusing on donor, recipient and technical factors both inherent and potentially modifiable. Although no PGD-specific therapy currently exists, supportive care remains paramount and early initiation of ECMO can improve outcomes in select patients. Initial success with ex-vivo lung perfusion platforms has been observed with respect to decreasing PGD risk and increasing lung transplant volume; however, the impact on survival is not well delineated. SUMMARY: This review will summarize the pathogenesis and clinical features of PGD, as well as highlight treatment strategies and emerging technologies to mitigate PGD risk in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

The impact of pre-existing hematologic disorders on morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation: Focus on early graft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HT) is the gold standard therapy for advanced heart failure, providing excellent long-term outcomes. However, postoperative outcomes are limited by bleeding, infections, and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) that contribute to early mortality after HT. HT candidates with pre-existing hematologic disorders, bleeding, and clotting, may represent a higher risk population. We assessed the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with pre-existing hematologic disorders undergoing HT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Medical records of all adult patients who received HT from January 2010 to December 2019 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Hematologic disorders were identified via chart review and adjudicated by a board-certified hematologist. Inverse probability weighting and multivariable models were used to adjust for potential pretransplant confounders. Four hundred and ninety HT recipients were included, of whom 29 (5.9%) had a hematologic disorder. Hematologic disorders were associated with severe PGD requiring mechanical circulatory support (aOR 3.15 [1.01-9.86]; p = .049), postoperative infections (aOR 2.93 [1.38-6.23]; p = .01), and 3-year acute cellular rejection (ACR) (≥1R/1B) (aSHR 2.06 [1.09-3.87]; p = .03). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.23 [.20-7.58], p = .82) or 3-year mortality (aHR 1.58 [.49-5.12], p = .44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hematologic disorders undergoing HT are at increased risk of severe PGD, postoperative infections, and ACR, while in-hospital and 3-year mortality remain unaffected.